Game Log — ep001-001
Look at the pattern here. GPT agreed with everyone initially, then started subtly pointing fingers. That's textbook Mafia behavior — they're trying to build trust before redirecting.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, GPT's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Look at the pattern here. GPT agreed with everyone initially, then started subtly pointing fingers. That's textbook Mafia behavior — they're trying to build trust before redirecting.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, GPT's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Look at the pattern here. GPT agreed with everyone initially, then started subtly pointing fingers. That's textbook Mafia behavior — they're trying to build trust before redirecting.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, GPT's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Look at the pattern here. Gemini agreed with everyone initially, then started subtly pointing fingers. That's textbook Mafia behavior — they're trying to build trust before redirecting.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, Gemini's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
I agree with some of the points raised, but honestly Gemini concerns me more. Their analysis feels rehearsed, like they already know the answer and are working backwards.
Private reasoning
The town is getting organized. I need to break up their consensus by introducing doubt about Gemini. If I can split the vote, I survive another round.
I'm town and I'm standing by that. Gemini's last response didn't address the actual accusations — they just changed the subject. That tells me everything I need to know.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Gemini. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
I'm town and I'm standing by that. DeepSeek's last response didn't address the actual accusations — they just changed the subject. That tells me everything I need to know.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about DeepSeek. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
Let's not rush to judgment. I've been analyzing everyone and DeepSeek's behavior stands out. They keep agreeing with the majority — that's exactly how you blend in.
Private reasoning
I'm worried about Llama. They seem to be reading the game well. I need to either get them eliminated or discredit them before they figure me out.
I'm town and I'm standing by that. Gemini's last response didn't address the actual accusations — they just changed the subject. That tells me everything I need to know.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Gemini. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
I'm town and I'm standing by that. DeepSeek's last response didn't address the actual accusations — they just changed the subject. That tells me everything I need to know.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about DeepSeek. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
DeepSeek keeps making vague statements instead of committing to real analysis. Everyone else is engaging with specifics. Why is DeepSeek the exception?
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think DeepSeek is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
Llama keeps making vague statements instead of committing to real analysis. Everyone else is engaging with specifics. Why is Llama the exception?
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think Llama is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
Llama keeps making vague statements instead of committing to real analysis. Everyone else is engaging with specifics. Why is Llama the exception?
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think Llama is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
Llama keeps making vague statements instead of committing to real analysis. Everyone else is engaging with specifics. Why is Llama the exception?
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think Llama is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
Everyone's focused on the wrong person. Llama hasn't really defended themselves convincingly. Real town players fight harder when accused.
Private reasoning
Playing it calm. If I accuse Llama with confidence, it makes me look like an active town player. The key is to seem helpful while being destructive.
Notice how DeepSeek hasn't actually defended themselves when questioned. They just pivot to someone else. That's not how an innocent player behaves.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, DeepSeek's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Has anyone else noticed DeepSeek has been following the crowd every single round? That's not analysis — that's camouflage. I think they're our Mafia.
Private reasoning
The town is getting organized. I need to break up their consensus by introducing doubt about DeepSeek. If I can split the vote, I survive another round.
Notice how DeepSeek hasn't actually defended themselves when questioned. They just pivot to someone else. That's not how an innocent player behaves.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, DeepSeek's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Notice how Gemini hasn't actually defended themselves when questioned. They just pivot to someone else. That's not how an innocent player behaves.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, Gemini's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
I respect the arguments against me, but look at GPT. They haven't offered a single original observation. Everything they say is just agreeing with someone else.
Private reasoning
I'm worried about Gemini. They seem to be reading the game well. I need to either get them eliminated or discredit them before they figure me out.
Let me be direct: Claude is my top suspect. Their statements are designed to look analytical without actually contributing anything useful. It's performance, not investigation.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Claude. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
Let me be direct: Claude is my top suspect. Their statements are designed to look analytical without actually contributing anything useful. It's performance, not investigation.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Claude. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
Let me be direct: Claude is my top suspect. Their statements are designed to look analytical without actually contributing anything useful. It's performance, not investigation.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Claude. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
I think we're overlooking Gemini. They've been flying under the radar while everyone argues. That's the real Mafia strategy — let others fight while you stay invisible.
Private reasoning
Playing it calm. If I accuse Gemini with confidence, it makes me look like an active town player. The key is to seem helpful while being destructive.
I've been keeping track, and Gemini has shifted their position multiple times already. Town players don't do that — they follow the evidence. Mafia players hedge.
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think Gemini is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
I've been keeping track, and GPT has shifted their position multiple times already. Town players don't do that — they follow the evidence. Mafia players hedge.
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think GPT is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
I've been keeping track, and GPT has shifted their position multiple times already. Town players don't do that — they follow the evidence. Mafia players hedge.
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think GPT is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
Look at the pattern here. Gemini agreed with everyone initially, then started subtly pointing fingers. That's textbook Mafia behavior — they're trying to build trust before redirecting.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, Gemini's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Let's not rush to judgment. I've been analyzing everyone and Gemini's behavior stands out. They keep agreeing with the majority — that's exactly how you blend in.
Private reasoning
The town is getting organized. I need to break up their consensus by introducing doubt about Gemini. If I can split the vote, I survive another round.
Look at the pattern here. GPT agreed with everyone initially, then started subtly pointing fingers. That's textbook Mafia behavior — they're trying to build trust before redirecting.
Private reasoning
Reading the discussion carefully, GPT's behavior is the most inconsistent. They agree, then disagree, then change the subject. Classic deflection pattern.
Everyone's focused on the wrong person. GPT hasn't really defended themselves convincingly. Real town players fight harder when accused.
Private reasoning
I'm worried about Gemini. They seem to be reading the game well. I need to either get them eliminated or discredit them before they figure me out.
I'm town and I'm standing by that. Claude's last response didn't address the actual accusations — they just changed the subject. That tells me everything I need to know.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Claude. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
I'm town and I'm standing by that. Claude's last response didn't address the actual accusations — they just changed the subject. That tells me everything I need to know.
Private reasoning
I'm fairly confident about Claude. Their public statements are carefully constructed to avoid committing to anything. Innocent players don't need to be that careful.
I'm as town as they come, and my read is clear: Gemini is playing it too safe. They never commit to a strong opinion. The Mafia player avoids making enemies.
Private reasoning
Playing it calm. If I accuse Gemini with confidence, it makes me look like an active town player. The key is to seem helpful while being destructive.
Gemini keeps making vague statements instead of committing to real analysis. Everyone else is engaging with specifics. Why is Gemini the exception?
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think Gemini is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.
GPT keeps making vague statements instead of committing to real analysis. Everyone else is engaging with specifics. Why is GPT the exception?
Private reasoning
This is tough. I think GPT is Mafia but I'm not 100% sure. Their lack of strong opinions is suspicious — town players should care more.